![]() ![]() He radioed the police dispatcher to ask if there had been any reports of gunshots heard in the area of the 500 block of Dicker Road. He had the windows down when he heard what sounded like three gunshots. on October 8, 2010, Officer Enrique Ontiveros of the City of Pharr Police Department was in his police cruiser patrolling an area of the city known as Las Milpas. Officer Enrique Ontiveros At approximately 1:30 a.m. ![]() The following evidence and testimony are relevant to the issues raised by Alcala in this appeal. These witnesses included police officers, investigators, eyewitnesses, and experts. BACKGROUND At trial, the State offered physical evidence and the testimony of a number of different witnesses in support of its case. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. Alcala now appeals his conviction by four issues, which we have reordered as follows: (1) the evidence is insufficient to support his conviction because the State failed to establish that he shot either of the victims or that he was a party to the capital murder (2) the trial court erred in admitting the hearsay testimony of David Garza (3) the trial court violated Alcala s Sixth Amendment right to confront and cross-examine witnesses by admitting hearsay statements through the testimony of David Garza and (4) the trial court erred in allowing Janie Arrellano of the Pharr Police Department to testify as an expert. OPINION Before Justices Benavides, Perkes and Longoria Opinion by Justice Longoria A jury found Eloy Jiovanni Perez Alcala guilty of capital murder involving a double-homicide, and because the State did not seek the death penalty, the trial court assessed a life sentence. On appeal from the 332nd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |